Saturday, February 11, 2012

Ancient Egyptian Festival Calendar: Peret

Peret (proyet - emergence or growth) was the second season in the ancient Egyptian calendar. The soil on the banks of the Nile was still very damp from the inundation and the fields were in the perfect condition for planting crops.


5; Sf-bdt (Ta-aabet, Tybi, Tobi)

month; Tybi

Day Festival
1 or 12 festival of Nehebkau ( a.k.a Beginning of Eternity)
13 fAt aHt - "raising the field"
20 sailing of Wadjet
29 sailing of Bast
29 festival of Raising the Willow
30 sailing of Sekhmet / Mut


6; rh-wr (Mekhir, Meshir, Amshir )

month; Tybi
Day Festival
1 sailing of Anubis
10 Going Forth of Wadjet singing in Heliopolis
14Hb skr sTA skr - two day festival known as "dragging Sokar"
15a festival known as Abd (month)
16 a festival known as mddnt (half-month)
30 a festival over several days known as "Amun in the festival of raising heaven"

7; rh- nds (Paremhat, Baramhat, Paenamenhotep, Phamenoth)

month; Phamenoth

Day Festival
1 festival of Ptah
17 hnt nt tA "sailing of the land"
21 festival of Amenhotep I
29 four day festival of Amenhotep I in Deir el-Medina


8; rnwt (Pharmuthi, Paremoude, Barmouda)

month; Pharmuthi

Day Festival
4 festival of Bast (known as the day of chewing onions for Bast)
5 sailing of Bast
25 harvest festival to Renenutet
27 granary offering to Renenutet

Ancient Egyptian Festival Calendar: Akhet

Akhet


hieroglyphs; Akhet The first season of the ancient Egyptian calendar was Akhet (appearance). This was the season in which the inundation occurred, and so it was dedicated to Hapi. it was hoped that he would ensure that the flood was not too low (resulting in a poor harvest) or too high (resulting in the destruction of mud-brick houses and paths built near to the Nile).
The inundation was also associated with the star Sirius because the star re-appeared (after a seventy day absence) at the new year heralding the flood. The star was associated with Sopdet (Sothis), Satet (Satis) and Isis .
The inundation was a quiet time for farmers as the fields were largely submerged. To earn tax relief (tax was a proportion of the food they produced) they could take on other jobs for the state. For example, during the Old Kingdom farmers could help with the construction of monuments such as the pyramids in return for living expenses and a tax rebate.



1; Tekh (Thoth, Thuti, Thout, Djwhty)

month; tekt, Thoth

Day Festival
1 wp rnpt- New Year (lit. opening of the year)
2 HAt rnpt- "front of the year"
3 ihhy -"jubilation"
10procession of Isis (Late Period)
15Hapi and Amun
17-18 Wagy or Wag
19 Wag and Thoth. festival
20 Tekh (drunkenness)
22 Great Procession of Osiris.
30 Osiris and Ennead

2; Menhet (Phaophi, Baba)

month; Phaophi

Day Festival
4 hnp Sa - pouring the sand'
5 mnht ha-hpr-ra - "cloth of Khakheperra (Senusret II)'"
and festival of Osiris and Ennead
15 or19 Ipet (Opet)festival (11 to 27 day festival of Amun
18 festival of Khnum and Anuket in Elephantine
27 2 day festival of Montu in Thebes
28 festival of Satet and Anuket in Elephantine


3; Hwt-Hru (hathor, Athyr)

month; Athyr

Day Festival
6 ht hAwy m Ssp itrw "evening offering in taking the river"
feast of Isis(Late Period)
7 Ssp itrw 'taking the river'
8 Abd 'month'
9 festival of Amun
15Fertility festival of Min
17 the lamentations of Isis and Nephthys (New Kingdom)
21Feast day of Ma ´at
30festival of Anuket in Elephantine





4; Ka-Hr-Ka (Nehebkau, Khoiak)

month; Khoiak

Day Festival
1 hnt Hwt-Hr - sailing of Hathor.
11 Hb skr -Sokar
18start of the Khoiak festival (Osiris)
22 Khoiak; Ploughing the Earth
26Khoiak; Sokar
30 Khoiak; raising the Djed pillar















Ancient Egyptian Calendars


The Ancient Egyptian calendar was originally based on twelve lunar months, grouped into three seasons of four months each. This was not ideal as the lunar month is only twenty-nine and a half days long, and so some years would actually contain thirteen new moons. The New Year was timed to coincide with the annual rising of the waters of the Nile. However, the actual date of the inundation could vary by as much as eighty days making it a very inaccurate marker for the beginning of the year. Luckily the Ancient Egyptians had noticed that noticed that the star Sirius (which was the brightest star in the sky), reappeared in the sky after an absence of seventy days and heralded the rising of the Nile. So they adopted this far more reliable date as the marker of their new year. The New Year officially began on the first new moon after the rising of Sirius. It is interesting to note the connection between the seventy day absence of Sirius before the inundation and New Year and the seventy day mumification ritual which ended with the rebirth of the decesaed in the afterworld.
The calendar was not very accurate, but could be set back into alignment every New Years day. However, while this was sufficient to manage the planting of crops and time the preparations for the inundation, it was not accurate enough to support a complex administration and easy calculation and collection of taxation. As a result, a new civic calendar was developed during the Early Dynastic Period based around three seasons of four thirty day months each divided into three "decades" (sets of ten days). The two calendars ran concurrently and were used for different functions.
Yet, this only amounted to a three hundred and sixty day year, so five epagomenal days (known as "heriu renpet") were added to the end of each year and dedicated to the five children of Nut (Osiris, Horus the Elder, Set, Isis and Nephthys). Yet this system still missed a quarter of a day each year, causing the calendar to slip slowly out of position. Ptolemy III tried to introduce an extra day every four years to correct this, but the Egyptians were resistant to this idea and it was not fully implemented until Augustus introduced the "leap year" in 30BC.
Despite their use of this apparently confusing system, the Ancient Egyptians were such acomplished astronomers and mathematicians that they constructed Abu Simbel so precisely that a ray of sunshine extended down an internal corridor to illuminated a statue of the pharaoh on his birthday!
Akhet
(inundation)
hieroglyphs; Akhet
Tekh
(Thoth)
month; tekt, Thoth
Menhet
(Phaophi)
month; Phaophi
Hwt-Hrw
(Athyr)
month; Athyr
Ka-Hr-Ka
(Khoiak)
month; Khoiak
Peret
(growth)
hieroglyphs; Peret
Sf-Bdt
(Tybi)
month; Tybi
Rekh Wer
(Mekhir)
month; Mekhir
Rekh Neds
(Phamenoth)
month; Phamenoth
Renwet
(Pharmuthi)
month; Pharmuthi
Shemu
(harvest)
hieroglyphs; Shemu
Hnsw
(Pakhon)
month; Pakhon
Hnt-Htj
(Payni)
month; Payni
Ipt-Hmt
(Epiph)
month; Epiph
Wep-Renpet
(Mesore)
month; Mesore


Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Medinet Habu Description of the 18. Dynasty Temple - Barque Shrine





The floor plan above shows the parts of the small temple of Amun which were built during the reign of Hatshepsut (I-----I) or Thutmosis III (I-----I). The red lines in the chapels built by Hatshepsut mark the walls which had been decorated by Hatshepsut - all other parts of the walls were either decorated by Thutmosis III or sketched by Hatshepsut but carved for Thutmosis III.


Above a reconstruction of the small temple of Amun after the temple had been extended by Thutmosis III (Hölscher, 1930)




The barque shrine which was probably built completely by Thutmosis III, was, however, in any case decorated by him. From the building which was begun in the time of Hatshepsut only the base and a few of the lower stone layers have been preserved. Originally, the ceiling of shrine of the 18th Dynasty was on the same level as that of the gallery (ambulatory). If any light whatever admitted except though the doors, it must have entered through openings in the roof.
In the time of Ptolemy VII Euergetes II, Cleopatra II and III, the shrine was raised by two additional stone layers and concealed by large stone blocks. After the Ptolemaic extension light entered through slits in the ceiling.
As stated by inscriptions the gates (below the west gate) of the shrine which was built of sandstone and a few limestone blocks became widened in the time of Ptolemy VII Euergetes II, Cleopatra II and III. With the exception of those on the east wall the exterior decoration during the reign of Thutmosis III remained unaltered. The decoration of the inner walls have been reworked in Ptolemaic period and whereby the reworking of the old relief were so faithfully adhered to that even a restoration text from Sethi I was rechiseled.


View into the barque shrine



Inside and outside the walls were crowned by circulating cavetto cornices and  torus moldings. Also the corners of the outside were decorated with torus moldings, however, mainly these are destroyed.


The interior of the shrine was decorated in 2 registers arranged one above the other. The registers show Thutmosis III sacrificing before the two manifestations of Amun, among other things on every side a scene shows the king before the the barque of Amun. On the south side Amun inscribes with the assistance of other gods the name of Thutmosis III on the leaves of the sacred išd tree of Heliopolis (photo above; on the right side of the tree the writing paintbrush is to be seen). In two representation, but on a smaller scale, appears Merit-Ra-Hatshepsut  behind the king.


The decoration of the west wall dates completely into the Ptolemaic period, below the ceiling there are the already mentioned inscriptions of Ptolemy VII Euergetes II, Cleopatra II and III.


On the eastern side the decorations are are dated into the time of Thutmosis III (jambs) and into the Ptolemaic period (lintel).





On both outer sides of the west gate Thutmosis III is shown embracing Amun - in both cases the ithyphallic manifestation  of Amun. On both outer sides of the east gate Thutmosis III receives lives from Amun.



Both exterior longitudinal walls show festal ceremonies which took place upon the founding and dedication of the temple.


The most eastern (left) scene of the north wall (photo above) shows Thutmosis III and the goddess Sefkhet-Abwy (a special form of the Seshat in the New Kingdom; Wilkinson, 2003) measuring the temple. The next scene to the right shows Thutmosis dedicating of the temple in Amun (no photo available).


The 2nd and 3rd scene show Thutmosis III "consecrating" (left) and "plowing" (middle) the area of the future temple before the ithyphallic Amun (right).


The 4th scene shows Thutmosis III obviously forming mudbricks!



The southern longitudinal wall shows in 5 scenes foundation ceremonies. The 1st scene (from the east to the west) shows the foundation text of Thutmosis III, in all remaining scenes a statue of the king, accompanied by a smaller figure of a dignitary, is presented to Amun. 

Medinet Habu Description of the 18. Dynasty Temple - Ambulatory






The floor plan above shows the parts of the small temple of Amun which were built during the reign of Hatshepsut (I-----I) or Thutmosis III (I-----I). The red lines in the chapels built by Hatshepsut mark the walls which had been decorated by Hatshepsut - all other parts of the walls were either decorated by Thutmosis III or sketched by Hatshepsut but carved for Thutmosis III.


Above a reconstruction of the small temple of Amun after the temple had been extended by Thutmosis III (Hölscher, 1930)




The today's gallery has a few alterations from later periods. For example, today 4 polygonal columns with a rather strange arrangement are standing in the ambulatory (the left photo below shows the eastern one of two columns on the north side). These polygonal columns were built-in by Achoris (3rd king of the 29th Dynasty), when construction faults in the foundation led to cracks in the barque shrine of Thutmosis III. The columns were taken from the adjacent chapels of the "God's Wifes of Amun" as testified by the cartouche of Amenirdis ont one of the columns. The columns were used to support in each case three or four stone blocks of the ceiling.

Polygonal columns built-in by Achoris (3rd king of the 29th Dyn.)Formerly plastered cartouche of the "God's Wife"  Amenirdis.



The access to the temples has been changed too. Originally, the ambulatory had only one entrance on the eastern side. Later 4 barriers (parapets) were removed between the pillars, so that the temple received two accesses on the north side as well as the south side.
On the northern side a gate (the next photo) was inserted between both eastern pillars by Achoris.
On the opposite south side another entrance was built at the same time together with the Ptolemaic wing. According to Hölscher it cannot be ascertained anymore when other both entrances had been built.


East side of the shrine and the gate of Achoris (right), behind the gate of Achoris the northern wing built in the ptolemaic period.



Sometime the windows were closed between the pillars with two stone slabs mounted on top of each other. One them is preserved from in situ in the southern window of the eastern side. These stone slabs were decorated on their outer side - the decoration of the preserved slab dates from the Saitic period and shows Isis and Osiris before an offering table, on the other side of the table a goddess (Satet?; Porter&Moss, Vol. II, p. 466) is depicted holding arrows and a bow in her hands.


Above teh east side of the 18. Dynasty-temple with the last stone slab placed in the (southern) left window. The photo below shows the decoration dated from the Saitic period.


The ambulatory was probably built completely by Thutmosis III. Only the 4 pillars of the eastern front (without pillarsat the corners) could still have been begun under Hatshepsut, because their horizontal joints lie in another level{plain} than those of the remaining pillars. The pillars are approx. 87 cms square, on the eastern side they are more closely spaced than on the other sides. The pillars are connected with parapet walls (intercolumnar walls) which were rounded at the top.



Above: the entrance of the gallery (ambulatory) viewed from the court erected during the Kushite period.


For the following presentation of the pillars, i.e. their decoration, the pillars were numbered as usual (see for comparison: Porter&Moss, BD II, or Myśliwiec, 1985). The numbering starts at the eastern entrance, the pillars A - H are south and the pillars I - P are north of the temple-axis.



All pillars were decorated on three sides by Thutmosis III, the outer sides - like the whole outside of the temple - were not decorated (until Ramses III). All representations always show Thutmosis III before a divinity - on the photo below he is shown on the eastern side of pillar P before Upuaut, "Lord of the Necropolis ", and receives "life" (in this scene Thutmosis III wears the Red Crown of Upper Egypt.
Almost all representations of the divinities were erased in the time of Akhnaton and restored in the 19th dynasty.


Myśliwiec stated (1985) that the scenes on the pillars should exhibit a special distribution. According to his analysis the king appears on the inside of each pillar always before Amun-Ra whereby he should wear in any of these presentation in correspondence with the geographic partition of the "Two Lands" on the north side the Red Crown of Lower Egypt and on the south side the White Crown of Upper Egypt.


Both statements prove untenable as for example on the photo above the king is depicted on the inside of pillar M wearing the White Crown of Upper Egypt (this can also be demonstrated at other places). On the inside of pillar N (photo below) he embraces the ithyphallic Amun-Kamutef, "Lord of the Heaven".


The insides of the pillars show the following arrangement (see als the table below): - the king is always depicted before one of the two manifestations of Amun;
- on the south side the king always weras the White Crown of Upper Egypt - except on pillar F  (where he is depicted before the ithyphallic Amun, and wears a kind of a wig);
- on the north side the king wears alternating the Red and the White Crown, parallel to pillar F on the south side he wears a special headress (nemes) in front of the ithyphallic Amun.

Pillar Inside
Pillar Inside





East Wall - north side
East Wall - south side
Amun-RaI
AAmun-Ra
Amun-Raj
BAmun-Ra





North Wall
South Wall
Amun-RaL
DAmun-Ra
Amun-RaM
EAmun-Ra
ithyphallic AmunN
Fithyphallic Amun
Amun-RaO
GAmun-Ra
Amun-RaP
HAmun-Ra





Red CrownNemes
   ???   White Crown


The table shows encoded in colors the distribution of the different types of crowns on the inside of the pillars which belong to the east wall (A,B, I, and J) and to the north or south wall.



From the table above it arises clearly that the statement of Myśliwiec applies only to the insides of the 4 pillars of the east wall (front side) of the ambulatory (i.e. for pillars I and J north of the temple axis, as well as to A and B south of the axis ; the pillars at the corner do not belong to the front wall).



In the representation for the peripteral temple Thutmosis III impresses particularly by various feather crowns. In general these crowns consist of some constant elements whose presence is optional: two  ostrich feather,
two falcon feathers,
two horizontal ram horns,
two high cow horns,
two little animal horns,
one solar disc,
two or more cobras of equal number.
The right photo of the north wall shows a scene in which Thutmosis III.  is performing grounding ceremonies.



In this group most often two crown types appear in which two ostrich feathers form the main element: a) the "atef"-Crown which consists of two ostrich feathers  framing a kind of "tiara" that looks like the White Crown (see photo above),
b) a crown assigned to the god Anedjtj in which the feathers are directly mounted on ram horns (as shown on western side of pillar M where Thutmosis III stands before Seth, "Lord of Upper Egypt, Lord of Heaven ", right photo).




The representation of the gods on the transverse sides of the pillars reveal the following arrangement (see table below):
- on the eastern, the front side of the temple, the main deities of the country and those of the realm of the dead are presented;
- on the south side appear the gods whose names show a geographical allocation to Nubia and the parts of Upper Egypt which lie to the south of Thebes; Sobek and Harendotes which have no geographical epithets establish an exception here;
- on the north side various gods have been arranged or those who have relations with the counties which lie north of Thebes.

Pillar

Pillar
Pillar

Pillar










East Wall - north side



East Wall - south side

JAmaunetAmun-RaI
AAtumRa-HorakhtiB
KMonthMutJ
BOsirisAnubisC










North Wall



South Wall

L
Gate of Achoris
K
CHarendotesSobekD
MHaroerisHathor of ThebenL
DHathor of EdfuSatetE
NHathor of DenderaSethM
EKhnumAnuketF
OHarsieseOnuris-ShuN
FHorus BehedetjHorusG
PUpuautKhnum (Hypselis)O
GNekhbetMenhit (Esna) H


ThotP
HHorus (Nubia)











Double CrownWhite Crown


Red CrownFeathercrown


The table shows which gods are presented opposite to each other on the transverse sides of the pillars and indicates by color-coding which crown Thutmosis III wears before the god. On the south side only feather crowns appear with 2 exceptions. Myśliwiec explains this by the fact that the king faces on pillar G the patron goddess Nekhbet and with a parallelism between the pillars H and P the exceptions. On the north side no special arrangement reveals itself.



On the opposite transverse sides of pillars I (right) and J (links) Myśliwiec detects an interesting combination of gods and crowns.




On the right (pillar I) Thutmosis III. appears before Amun wearing the Red Crown of Upper Egypt, on the left (pillar J) he wears before Amaunet a doublefeather crown like Amun (plus ram horns), whereas now the goddess is depicted with the Red Crown of Upper Egypt.
Does Thutmosis identify himself with Amun, the husband of Amunet?



Myśliwiec supposes additional ideas behind the decoration, e.g. the representation of gods with solar aspects (Atum, Ra-Horahkti) on opposite pillar sides, but he could demonstrate them - again with exceptions - only on pillars south of the temple axis.
Independent of all details and possible ideas behind the decoration, above all, obviously one statement of Thutmosis III. was behind the representation of the king in the presence of the most important gods of the Egyptian realm of gods: "I am the legitimated ruler, accepted by all gods."



The temple from the 18th Dynasty had only one access on its eastern side (see photo below) which probably could not be closed by a gate. Only the eastern outside of the temple was decorated with relief and inscriptions. The architrave bears a long inscription with titles of Thutmosis III, the outsides of the 6 pillar show the king in front of Amun. On the southern outside Thutmosis III wears like on the southern inside always the White Crown of Upper Egypt. On northern outside he wears a Red Crown or a Double Crown (on the left) and a feather crown with 2 cobras and ram horns (middle). The representation on the right corner pillar is not visible due to the Ptolemaic extension.



On left half of the Ptolemaic lintel  Ptolemy VII Euergetes and Cleopatra II are depicted before the ithyphallic Amun and Amaunet, on the right of it Ptolemy offers a figure of Ma'at to Amun and Mut. On the right half Ptolemy and Cleopatra III are shown before Re-Horakhti and Hathor (far right), to the left Ptolemy offers again a figure Ma'at to Amun and Khons. The lintel is crowned with a winged solar disc with 2 cobras.

The Mastaba of Ti at Saqqara

  The wall measures 1.55m wide by 4.50m in height, of which the upper 2.75m is decorated. It contains scenes with seventy-four characters di...